Summary of the role of ‘General Evaluator’
- Evaluates the evaluators.
- Evaluate table topics evaluator.
- Evaluates everyone in the meeting who have not already been evaluated.
Consider the following questions when you are required to evaluate:
- Have you motivated the speaker?
- Did you given appropriate commendations and recommendations (based on speech objectives)?
- Did you identify what, why and how in your recommendation/s to the speaker?
Before the meeting
- Ring/Email the chairperson to check on any special issues about the meeting (not always necessary).
- Review agenda to see what is likely to come up.
- Prepare paper for taking notes.
At the start of the meeting
- Arrive in good time; see if chairperson and ASA arrive in good time to prepare room.
- See if there have been any changes to the agenda.
- Did the meeting start on time? Did the ASA greet guests and obtain their contact details?
During the meeting
- Write notes on performance of all those who are not otherwise evaluated: Chairperson, ASA, Timekeeper, Grammarian, Table Topics Evaluator, speech Evaluators.
- Did the meeting run according to the agenda? If not, were deviations explained and well managed?
- Did people explain their roles and then act according to those explanations?
- Was the atmosphere positive and helpful?
Presenting the evaluation
- Avoid spending too long evaluating any one role
- Don’t include too many recommendations for any one person – one or two will be enough for a person to take in and focus on
- Be positive, but do provide constructive suggestions for improvement. (Not “The meeting was poorly controlled”, but “The meeting might have flowed more smoothly if Peter had reminded people to keep to the times on the agenda.”)
- Speak in the third person – address the audience, not the individual.






